In The Histories, Herodotus described the conflict between his own people, the Greeks, and the Persian Empire. While telling the story of their own civilization in conflict with another, many people would be inclined to take sides, but Herodotus strove to show each side's perspective in the struggle. In this, he was like the great poet Homer, but Herodotus innovated even further. Homer wrote his epic as if narrated by a goddess; Herodotus spoke with his own voice, and relayed his own experiences and research.
Before Herodotus, accounts of important events had been the purview of royalty, minstrels and priests. Perhaps his innovation in relaying information was partly responsible for his reputation as the "Father of Lies." Historians of classical antiquity suspected Herodotus of passing along hearsay, and perhaps even inventing tales for his own amusement.
Born the fifth century BC, Herodotus passed his childhood in the Greek city of Halicarnassus in what is now Turkey. It was a city of mixed ethnicity, and many of its residents had fought on the side of Troy in the Trojan War. Maybe the mixed ethnicity lent Herodotus some open-mindedness — and prepared him to write about the new war in which more Greeks fought for the Persian ruler Xerxes than against him. Conflict may have driven Herodotus out of Halicarnassus, and he likely spent years in exile due to regional wars.
Herodotus was — if his claims were truthful — a widely traveled and well-read historian, yet he passed along tales of mythical griffins, flying dragons and gigantic heroes. His account of the phoenix — the mythical bird that lives for centuries and is consumed by and reborn in fire — is considered the bird's introduction to the West, although he may have borrowed from an earlier account. The Histories were littered with snippets that beggar belief. He wrote that pacifist Argippaeans were born bald and stayed bald all their lives and ate only the fruit of one type of tree. He argued that a lioness could have only one cub in her entire life since the cub's claws would tear up her womb, and he wrote that the hippopotamus had the mane and tail of a horse. He wrote that ibises were useful because they killed "winged snakes."
Was he simply a liar? In fact he exhibited a healthy skepticism, prefacing many accounts with phrases such as "I believe," "I can't say," "it seems likely," "it seems unlikely," and "the first of whom we know." He liked firsts, but he also liked caveats. And modern finds in paleontology and archaeology suggest his claims had at least some basis in fact. Historian Jennifer Roberts writes:
Specialists who can read languages that stumped Herodotus have discovered that the ancient texts confirm his findings more often than they refute them. . . . The most natural explanation by far of his astonishing rate of success is that, by and large, he went where he said he did and thought he had seen what he said he had, although misperception and faulty memory inevitably played a role.
In his writings, Herodotus often digressed, sharing what he learned from interviewing those he met, and creating some of the more interesting parts of The Histories. He interviewed Scythians living near the Black Sea about their lives, for instance. He also asked them what they knew about the lives of other nomads living farther east. In some cases, Herodotus relayed information that had been through several translations (he knew only his native Greek) yet, remarkably, modern excavations in Russia and Kazakhstan have found artifacts similar to what he described.
Regarding mythical creatures, Herodotus believed that some legends he heard preserved a kernel of genuine fact, and he helped spread the legend of the griffin. Griffins, according to the nomads he interviewed, were four-legged and lion-sized, with wings and sharp beaks. What might the nomads have seen that prompted these myths? Modern paleontological digs in the region have revealed fossil skeletons of Protoceratops and Psittacosaurus dinosaurs. The nomads of his time may have seen similar skeletons eroding out of the sediments along the Silk Road. These weren't the only potential fossils mentioned in Herodotus's works. When in Egypt, he wrote, he was shown piles of "bones and spines." These may have belonged to spinosaurs, large Cretaceous reptiles with dorsal membraned spines, or to pterosaurs. And the giant skeletons of heroes he discussed may well have belonged to fossil mammals from the Miocene, Pliocene and Pleistocene epochs.
Herodotus mentioned at least one unambiguous fossil find. "I have seen shells on the hills," he wrote of Egypt. He reached a conclusion that is common today: The area "was originally an arm of the sea." Herodotus also ventured into the field of geology, guessing (inaccurately) that in the recent geologic past, Egypt had been a gulf of the sea. Although he was wrong about Egypt's geology, he was right in concluding that the world we live in changes over time, thanks to natural processes. And he provided a thoughtful analysis:
In Arabia, not far from Egypt, there is a long and narrow gulf running inland from the sea called the Erythraen [perhaps the Gulf of Suez]. . . . Now if the Nile should choose to divert its waters from their present bed into this Arabian gulf, what is there to hinder it from being filled up by the stream within, at the utmost, 20,000 years? For my part, I think it would be filled up in half the time. How then should not a gulf, even of much greater size, have been filled up in the ages that passed before I was born, by a river that is at once so large and so given to working changes?
Far from a simple father of lies, Herodotus was arguably the world's first anthropologist, who also made inroads in geology, even though he didn't practice science as we know it today.
Narrative text and graphic design © by Michon Scott - Updated October 20, 2012